|
Home--Campaigns--Coca-Cola Coca-Cola: A Model for Good Public Relations, Not Sustainability The following opinion appeared in the Economic Times, the largest English business daily in India. The Coca-Cola company and its CEO, Mr. Neville Isdell, must be congratulated for some excellent public relations work lately, and in particular, in India. Neville Isdell was the "guest editor" of the Economic Times on March 17, 2008 and he used the platform provided him to pull off a wonderful public relations coup that would make marketing textbooks - create an image of itself that it clearly is not. In his editorial "A New Model of Sustainability", Mr. Isdell writes that we must view business from a "broader context" and that if the communities are not sustainable, then the business is not sustainable. We must agree. But Coca-Cola is the least qualified company to talk about new ways of operating and building sustainable communities, given its track record in India. Not once in the entire newspaper, which also included a lengthy section on corporate social responsibility, did the crisis that Coca-Cola creates and faces in India find mention. We feel it is time to set the record straight and away from the spin of Coca-Cola. Coca-Cola's bottling plants in India are the target of many community-led campaigns, accusing the company of worsening water shortages in areas where it operates and polluting the scarce remaining water and soil. In a very high profile case, one of Coca-Cola's largest bottling plants in India, in Plachimada, Kerala, has been shut down since March 2004 because government and independent agencies have confirmed that the bottling plant has polluted the water and soil in the area. Coca-Cola, in the past, has rejected the campaigns against it in India as being not based on facts and the agenda of anti-globalization activists. But the momentum has turned against Coca-Cola, as various government and independent studies confirm what the communities who live around Coca-Cola's bottling plants have been saying all along - that the Coca-Cola company is responsible for exacerbating water crises and pollution. In what must have been a shocker for Coca-Cola, a study that it paid for (and conducted by the Energy and Resources Institute - TERI) released earlier this year was a scathing indictment of the company's operations in India. The company was forced to agree to an assessment of its operations in India a result of a sustained international campaign led by the India Resource Center to hold Coca-Cola accountable. Not surprisingly, the study found no mention in Mr. Isdell's edition. Coca-Cola's own study has recommended that Coca-Cola shut down its bottling plant in Kala Dera in Rajasthan. The study found that the "plant's operations in this area would continue to be one of the contributors to a worsening water situation and a source of stress to the communities around." Noting that Coca-Cola has not respected the rights of farmers and groundwater conditions, the study also warned Coca-Cola about declining water conditions around another campaign hotspot-Mehdiganj in Uttar Pradesh. Bolstered by the study, the community of Mehdiganj will be holding a demonstration against the bottling plant later this month. The study by TERI also found that in the plants assessed, not one plant had met the Coca-Cola company's own wastewater treatment standards. What is the point of having your own standards, we ask, if you don't meet them? And the study found an alarming incidence of pollution in the immediate vicinity of Coca-Cola's bottling plants. The assessment, which covered only six plants (out of fifty) is very clear that the Coca-Cola company has located its bottling plants in India from strictly a "business continuity" perspective that has not taken the wider context into perspective. So where is the placing of the business in a "broader context" that the Coca-Cola CEO talked about in his editorial? Surely not in India. And sustainable communities? Coca-Cola's own study has confirmed that the company is responsible for exacerbating water crises, and recommended the shut down of one of its bottling plants. Coca-Cola has not respected the rights of farmers, and has exploited the groundwater to such an extent in some areas that thousands of farmers have lost their livelihoods. The Coca-Cola company did not even bother to share the environmental impact assessments (that it should have conducted prior to locating its bottling plants across India) for the study after repeated requests. Coca-Cola cited legal and confidential reasons for not sharing the reports. The environmental impact assessments look at the various factors including water availability, existing stresses on water and potential impacts on the community. The fact is that the Coca-Cola company has located many of its bottling plants in India strictly from a business and profit motivated principle, and has given scant, if any, attention to the impacts on the community. Such a company cannot and must not be allowed to talk about new models of sustainability. Coca-Cola must walk the walk before it can talk the talk. Amit Srivastava is the Director of India Resource Center, an international campaigning organization based in San Francisco, USA. |
PRESS: Coca-Cola Forced to Abandon $25 Million Project in India
PRESS: Coca-Cola Expansion Plans Rejected
PRESS: Coca-Cola Plant Shut Down in India, Authorities Cancel License
STUDY: Coca-Cola’s Operations in India Lead to “Tragedy of the Commons”
PRESS: 15 Village Councils Reject Coca-Cola Plans as Opposition Grows
PRESS: Coca-Cola Expansion Plan Opposed in Mehdiganj, India
>> More
Stories
Home
| About | How to
Use this Site | Sitemap | Privacy
Policy
India
Resource Center (IRC) is a project of Global Resistance -- "Building
Global Links for Justice"
URL: http://www.IndiaResource.org
Email:info (AT) IndiaResource.org