| Home--News Peoples Report Card Outlines Governance 
           Agenda for India 
 Rajiv 
            Tikoo
 OneWorld South Asia
 December 16, 2004 
            
            The realization of the promises for development, made by the Indian 
            government at the national and the international level, call for necessary 
            political will, adequate budgetary allocation, and civil society participation, 
            emphasizes Citizens Report on Governance and Development 2004, which 
            was launched in New Delhi on December 14. 
            
            Published by Social Watch India, the report seeks to assess critically 
            the contribution of the Parliament, the executive, the judiciary and 
            local self-governance institutions to the countrys social development 
            from peoples perspectives. Says John Samuel, international director 
            of ActionAid International, Peoples participation is important because 
            governance is too important to be left to politicians and bureaucrats. 
            Adds Kuldip Nayar, a senior journalist and former Member of Parliament, 
            Its important for people to be vigilant and to speak up. 
            
            Social Watch India, a network of civil society organizations, has 
            analysed the functioning of the four institutions of governance in 
            the context of the countrys 10th Five Year Plan, the United Nations 
            (news - web sites) Millennium Development Goals and the Common Minimum 
            Program of the ruling government. 
            
            The report is in four sections - Seeking Accountability: Parliament 
            Watch; Broken Promises: Policy Watch; Access to Justice: Judiciary 
            Watch and Grassroots Democracy: Local Governance Watch. Says Dr Rajesh 
            Tandon, president of PRIA (Society for Participatory Research in Asia), 
            These may be broad pillars of governance, but they are the most relevant. 
            
            In the section on Seeking Accountability: Parliament Watch, the report 
            notes that the Parliament did not live up to its role as parliamentary 
            time and public money were wasted on inter-party political controversies. 
            Over 60 hours, worth US $1,505,971, were wasted due to disruptions 
            in the Lok Sabha, which sat for only 74 days in 2003 as compared to 
            an average of over 100 days during the first 36 years since 1952. 
            
            The report tracks the government policies on livelihood, education 
            and health in the section titled Broken Promises: Policy Watch. The 
            report notes that the growth rate of employment between 1987 to 1994 
            and 1993 to 2000 dipped from 2.03 per cent to 0.58 per cent in rural 
            areas and from 3.39 to 2.27 per cent in urban areas. 
            
            The state of health also continues to be unhealthy. Indias public 
            expenditure on health is amongst the lowest in the world. Spending 
            4.46 per cent of the Gross Domestic Product on healthcare, India ranks 
            171st out of 175 countries in the world on the index. 
            
            The assessment in the section on Access to Justice: Judiciary Watch 
            is mixed. The report recognizes that the number and the manner of 
            interventions by high courts and the Supreme Court on various aspects 
            of the fundamental rights to food, work, education and health are 
            steps towards rights-based approach to social development. 
            
            The apex courts interpretation and inclusion of the right to work 
            as a positive right guaranteed under Article 21 of the constitution 
            and upholding of the right to health as a fundamental right under 
            Article 21 came in for special mention. At the same time, the report 
            points out that the biggest problem nevertheless continues to be implementation 
            of the law. 
            
            The last section - Grassroots Democracy: Local Governance Watch rues 
            that the laudable initiative for decentralization of governance has 
            been circumvented by the alliance of elite political interests, change-resistant 
            bureaucracy and the rent-seeking class, which has well entrenched 
            interests in the continuation of a colonial, centralised, state structure. 
            
            Nevertheless, on a positive note, India has constitutionally mandated 
            232,332 village panchayats, (village-level local bodies) 6,000 intermediate 
            panchayats (block level local bodies) and 534 district panchayats 
            (district level local bodies). The three-tiered elected bodies consist 
            of 27,75,858 village panchayat members, 1,44,491 members of the intermediate 
            panchayats and 15,067 members of district panchayats. 
            
            The report does not stop here. Stating that apart from generating 
            awareness about the functioning of the parliament, executive, judiciary 
            and local self governments, the need of the hour is to leverage the 
            space and positive initiatives of these institutions to make democracy 
            work. Says Jagadananda, head of Centre for Youth and Social Development 
            (CYSD), an Indian NGO, Democracy is real when people are empowered. 
            Social Watch India is creating an enabling environment for empowerment. 
            
            The Social Watch Coalition has initiated state-level processes in 
            the Indian states of Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Orissa, Chattisgarh, 
            Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Rajasthan. Adds Dr Yogesh 
            Kumar, executive director of Samarthan, The expectation is that these 
            processes will raise and articulate citizens voices and concerns from 
            grassroots and open up the possibility of linking up these with the 
            process of governance, democracy and development.
 FAIR USE NOTICE.  This document contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. India Resource Center is making this article available in our efforts to advance the understanding of corporate accountability, human rights, labor rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |