Home--News
Indian States Reiterate Coke, Pepsi Ban
By RAJESH MAHAPATRA
Associated Press
August 23, 2006
NEW DELHI, India - Several Indian states on Wednesday insisted they
would continue to ban the sale of Coca-Cola and PepsiCo soft drinks
even though the federal Health Ministry dismissed allegations that
the beverages contained pesticide residues.
Analysts said Indian authorities need to do more to end the health
scare, which erupted three weeks ago, saying it could hurt India's
image.
At least seven Indian states have banned sale of soft drinks made
by the Indian subsidiaries of Coca-Cola Co. and PepsiCo Inc. at schools,
colleges and government offices after the Center for Science and Environment
in New Delhi said the levels of pesticides in the drinks made them
unsafe for humans.
The southern state of Kerala went even further, imposing a total ban
and asking the two companies to shut plants there.
But Indian Health Minister Anbumani Ramadoss told Parliament on Tuesday
that his ministry found the center's data flawed. He said a government-appointed
committee found that the sampling method followed by the Center for
Science and Environment didn't have "a scientific and statistically
valid basis."
While Coca-Cola India and PepsiCo India welcomed the announcement,
the CSE claimed the Indian government was trying to shield the companies.
The CSE said almost all soft drinks sold in India contain high levels
of pesticides, but the focus was on Coke and Pepsi because the two
account for nearly 80 percent of India's $2 billion soft drink market.
Similar allegations of pesticide contamination in drinks surfaced
in India in 2003, but the government has yet to set and enforce quality
standards for such products.
"The issue has been around for three years. It impacts India's image,"
said Rajeev Malik, a JPMorgan Chase & Co. analyst based in Singapore.
Malik said the ban imposed by some of the states will unlikely have
any immediate impact on foreign companies looking to invest in India
and its booming economy. But "it doesn't speak well of how things
are done there, and in the long term there could be some impact,"
he said.
Still, authorities in Kerala insisted the state's ban stands.
"Repeated studies have proved that the colas are not good for health.
So we have banned them for people's welfare," said P. K. Sreemathi,
Kerala's health minister. "Our decision is final ... We will enforce
it strictly."
Both Coca-Cola and Pepsi have bottling plants in Kerala. Both insist
their products are safe and have already challenged the ban in the
state's High Court. The case is scheduled to be heard Thursday.
Authorities in three other states _ Gujarat, Karnataka and Andhra
Pradesh _ said they had no plans to reverse the ban on sale of the
soft drinks at schools, colleges, hospitals and government offices.
"There is no question of going back on the (ban) order," said Gujarat
Health Minister Ashok Bhatt.
It was not immediately clear if the states of Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh
and Chattisgarh, which also imposed a similar ban, would review their
decisions.
Indian states have broad autonomy to make their own health and education
policies, and they cannot be overruled by the federal government.
In Karnataka, authorities have filed a case of food adulteration against
Coca-Cola India and PepsiCo, said R. Ashok, the state's health minister.
Ashok said the state had conducted independent tests at its government
laboratories, which supported the disclosure made by the Center for
Science and Environment.
He said the federal health minister's statement on Tuesday "surprised"
him.
FAIR USE NOTICE. This document contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. India Resource Center is making this article available in our efforts to advance the understanding of corporate accountability, human rights, labor rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|