|
Home--News
Soft Drinks in India Still Unsafe
Press Release
Centre for Science and Environment
August 2, 2006
- Finds the 2006 nationwide study by Centre for Science and Environment
(CSE)
- Little done since 2003, when CSE found unsafe levels of pesticides
in soft drink samples from Delhi
- The Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) had asked for standards
for carbonated beverages; the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS)
has formulated standards. But the finalised standards have not
been notified
- Our health, particularly the health of our children, seems to
be of little concern to the regulator, the Union ministry of health
and family welfare
New Delhi, August 2, 2006: Three years after CSE
released its findings on pesticide residues in soft drinks, a new
nationwide study shows nothing much has changed: soft drinks remain
unsafe and unhealthy. And public health remains severely compromised.
Worse, even the directions given by the Joint Parliamentary Committee
(JPC) have been disregarded: standards for safety have been finalised
but blocked because of company opposition. Our health is nobody's
business, it would seem, indicts the study.
The 2006 CSE study tests 57 samples of 11 soft drink brands, from
25 different manufacturing plants of Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, spread
over 12 states. The study finds pesticide residues in all samples;
it finds a cocktail of 3-5 different pesticides in all samples - on
an average 24 times higher than BIS norms, which have been finalised
but not yet notified. The levels in some samples - for instance, Coca-Cola
bought in Kolkata -- exceeded the BIS standards by 140 times for the
deadly pesticide Lindane. Similarly, a Coca-Cola sample manufactured
in Thane contained the neurotoxin Chlorpyrifos, 200 times the standard.
"This is clearly unacceptable as we know that pesticides are tiny
toxins and impact our bodies over time," says Sunita Narain, director,
CSE.
The current study was conducted by the same Pollution Monitoring Laboratory
of CSE, which had tested samples in 2003. It will be recalled that
the two soft drink companies had raised numerous issues regarding
the veracity of the CSE study and the capabilities of its laboratory
staff, which were scrutinised and debunked by JPC in its report. The
JPC endorsed the methodology and the findings of the 2003 CSE study.
This time, further improvements have been made. Firstly, the laboratory
is now accredited with ISO 9001:2000 quality management system. Secondly,
the laboratory has confirmed the presence of the pesticides using
an expensive and state of art equipment -- the GS-MS. "We have fully
complied with the JPC directions and are even more confident about
our findings," says Chandra Bhushan, associate director at CSE.
In 2003, the average level of pesticide residues in Delhi samples
was 34 times above the same BIS standard. But this cannot be taken
even as a marginal reduction, because this time, shockingly, CSE has
found pesticide residues as high as 52 times in bottles bought in
Kolkata, and 42 times in bottles bought in Nainital and Gorakhpur.
Similarly, bottles bought in Mumbai, manufactured in Thane and Nagpur,
are 34 times above the BIS standard.
The dumber number game
"Safety is also not only about high or low numbers," explains Narain.
Companies tell us that they are safe because pesticide residues are
tiny and are lower in their products than what is found in other products
- say, milk and juice. But this is scientific jugglery. Pesticides
are tiny toxins and deadly for us if we are exposed to quantities
higher than what is defined as an acceptable limit. In other words,
our exposure, through the food we eat and water we drink, must be
kept under the threshold of safety. The safe limit - or the standard
-- in each product is set keeping in mind the nutrition-pesticide
trade-off - a quota for residues can be allowed in nutritive food
like milk or juice, but not in non-nutritive products like carbonated
beverages. This is why, since the release of its 2003 study, CSE has
demanded that government must set standards for safe levels of pesticide
residues in soft drinks.
"This is a grave public health scandal," says Narain. In early February
2004, confirming the unsafe levels of pesticides in soft drinks, JPC
had directed government to set standards for these residues in the
products. Since then, the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) has, in
its sectional committee, met over 20 times to deliberate on the standards.
In October 2005, after months of data analysis and discussion with
all stakeholders - including the two soft drink majors - the standards
were finalised by the committee. In March 2006, the committee met
once again to reconfirm the standards. But since then, the status
remains the same: the standards are finalised but not notified.
The final standards are ironically being opposed by the Union ministry
of health and family welfare, which argues that more research needs
to be done. The ministry has, in the last three years, set up committee
after committee, and various sub-committees, to examine the safety
concerns, but with little progress. Clearly, 'good' science cannot
become a pretext for prevarication and obstruction. "We know that
the companies are strongly opposed to this standard as it will bring
them under the ambit of regulators," says CSE which has also put deliberations
on all issues concerning the setting of standards, in the public domain.
This is an issue of public health and so, it is not negotiable. Our
demand is simple, says CSE: The government must notify the final product
standards and make these mandatory for soft drink companies, so that
soft drinks, consumed particularly by children, are checked and regulated.
No more delays. No more procedures. We want safety first and foremost.
For the complete Down To Earth cover story, the CSE lab report, the
press conference presentation, this press release and related documents,
please visit: http://www.cseindia.org/misc/cola- indepth/cola2006/cola-index.htm
If you have questions, contact Souparno Banerjee or Shachi Chaturvedi
at souparno@cseindia.org or shachi@cseindia.org or call them on 9810098142.
Highlights of the 2006 CSE study on pesticides in colas-II:
- A cocktail
of 3-6 pesticides was present in all samples.
- Lindane (a confirmed
carcinogen) levels were over 54 times above the BIS standard; in one
Coca-Cola sample from Kolkata, it was 140 times higher.
- Chlorpyrifos
(a known neurotoxin) levels were 47 times higher; a Coca-Cola sample
from Mumbai had a 200 times higher level.
- Heptachlor, banned in
India, was found in 71 per cent of the samples, at levels 4 times
higher than BIS standards.
- Average amount of pesticide residues
found in all the samples was 11.85 parts per billion (ppb) - 24 times
higher than the BIS standards for total pesticides in soft drinks
(0.5 ppb).
- Pepsi cola contained 30 times higher residues on an average.
- Coca-Cola contained 27 times higher residues on an average.
FAIR USE NOTICE. This document contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. India Resource Center is making this article available in our efforts to advance the understanding of corporate accountability, human rights, labor rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|
